A bit of Bragg

May 22, 2016

I present to you part of a letter from Lt. Col. Bolling Hall, Jr, of the 59th Alabama Infantry. It was written on December 6, 1863, addressed to Hall’s father. I find it very interesting.

Speaking of the battle of Missionary Ridge, notes Hall, “All blame Hardee with it that I have seen. Every body says Bragg is not at all to blame. You would be, I can almost say, astoundeBolling Halld were you to go into the army to see what a calamity all without exception regard the removal of Bragg.

I have talked to many from different commands & the confidence is universal in him. Of course I do not refer to general officers. I talked to none of them about it. Col. Sawyer [of the 24th Alabama Infantry] told me he always knew that Btagg was popular with a majority but he has been astonished to find how strong & universal the feeling is for Bragg and how great the confidence in him.

I heard several say the defeat at Missionary ridge was not as great a calamity as the removal of Genl Bragg & the latter has demoralized the army more than the former. What are we to come to if newspapers and politicians too cowardly themselves to go into danger are thus to break down our best & bravest Generals.

I have seen but one man who thinks Hardee can replace Bragg, i.e. is competent to take his place.”

 

Not the usual sort of commentary.

 

 

A day at Perryville

May 6, 2016

Last Saturday I spent a (soggy) day at Perryville, Kentucky’s state battlefield park commemorating the engagement of October 8, 1862. I was there because I was coming home from Chattanooga, and the Western Theater Civil War Historians’ conference, an annual event I try and attend every spring.

Good friends Andy Papen and Darryl Smith, both of whom have often joined me at Chickamauga for the March Study Group, were at Perryville – Darryl acting as guide for Andy’s CWRT, out of Missouri.They invited me to tag along.

I have been to Perryville several times, and once designed a game on it. The park has grown exponentially over the years – when I first visited, the entire park encompassed something like 98 acres. Now, it boasts of over a thousand acres. Heady stuff, for preservationists.

We spent the day on the field, despite the morning’s light rain. The park is now amazingly well interpreted, and Darryl delivered a solid interpretation. I thoroughly enjoyed myself.
We ended the day discussing the fighting at Starkweather’s Hill, where one of my favorite stories to emerge out of the battle of Perryville was played out. At Perryville, the 1st Wisconsin Infantry supported and helped defend the 4th Indiana Battery. The 4th Indiana did not forget that service. In the summer of 1863, the men of the 4th took up a collection to help purchase a new set of colors for the 1st Wisconsin – which were presented with all due ceremony.

1st Wisc flag

On September 20, 1863, the men of the 1st Wisconsin were carrying this same flag when they were in support of the same 4th Indiana Battery.

If you are interested in exploiring Perryville with Darryl, I suggest his new venture, Walking with History; or follow his own musings about the battle on his blog, Ohio at Perryville.

Flags, flags, and more flags: A Confederate odyssey.

April 23, 2016

Here is what today we call the Rebel Flag. Of all the flags pictured below, it is the only one that was NEVER carried into action at Chickamauga.

Modern rebel flag

By Dave Powell and Greg Biggs

(Note: I am not a civil war flag expert. As the saying goes, I know just enough to get myself in trouble. But I wanted to address the flags of Chickamauga, and not appear too dimwitted. Ergo, I asked Greg Biggs, who really is an ACW flag expert, to comment/correct my post. He ended up adding so much to the process that I feel it only fair he get co-writing credit. Thank you Greg.)

A Chickamauga Park Ranger once told me an interesting story. One day a man walked into the Visitor’s Center. The lobby is impressive, lined with portraits of Union and Confederate commanders, draped with U.S. flag bunting, state flags hanging from the ceiling. This visitor, however, was unimpressed.

“Where are the Confederate flags?” he demanded. So the ranger took him over to the Hardee-pattern corps flag on display, and pointed it out. Next he showed the man the Polk-pattern corps flag. “There,” said the ranger.

That visitor’s confusion is forgivable. Moreover, it is historically accurate. Sorting out flags at Chickamauga was, in fact, pretty difficult – and sometimes deadly.

Today, the Confederate battle flag – the familiar red field, blue-and-white St. Andrews Cross and white stars, often misidentified as the “Stars and Bars” – can be seen around the world. People wave it for all sorts of reasons, and it is the subject of much debate, especially here in the United States.

But at Chickamauga, it was not common at all. There were probably as many as eight different patterns of flag carried as Confederate battle flags, and most of them looked nothing like what we now call “the” battle flag. And that doesn’t even count the minor variants within the larger pattern types.

The key is the flag history of the Army of Tennessee, itself created as the Army of the Mississippi in March 1862 from four other armies.  Forming at Corinth, MS after the fall of Fort Donelson and Nashville, the core components were; the Army of Central Kentucky, Polk’s Grand Division; Bragg’s Army of Mobile and Pensacola, and the Eastern Division of the District of Kentucky & East Tennessee.

Hardee flagIn January 1862, the Central Kentucky troops adopted a simple blue flag with white disc in the center designed by Simon B. Buckner, possibly modeled after flags used by the pre-war Kentucky State Guard.  First employed at Fort Donelson, these flags were later carried by Gen. William Hardee’s Corps and thus, have borne his name since.  Six versions of this flag would see use over the course of the war.

Polk flagPolk’s troops adopted large blue silk flags, bearing a red St. George’s Cross adorned with thirteen white stars.  These flags waved over his corps at Shiloh. On the orders of Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard, they were replaced shortly thereafter  by the Southern Cross flags made in New Orleans, and modeled on flags in use in Virginia.  Beauregard left the army in June 1862, replaced by Gen. Braxton Bragg, who seemed not to care about flag design: Bragg offered no objection when  Polk went back to a version of his previous battle flag; a smaller version made of wool bunting, and bearing eleven white stars.  The flag was inspired by Episcopalian Church heraldry, of which Polk had been a bishop.

First nationalThe troops from Mobile and Pensacola arrived bearing First National flags and these were ordered replaced by Beauregard with the Southern Cross flags made in New Orleans.  These were the square versions and Bragg’s troops followed them at Shiloh and through the rest of 1862 and even into 1863.  Later, a rectangular version of the flag was issued serving late into 1863.  As stated, some of these flew over Polk’s troops for a time.

Breckinridge flagThe troops from East Tennessee, defeated at Mill Springs in January 1862, carried mostly First National flags.  At Shiloh they were the core of Gen. John Breckinridge’s Reserve Corps, which also carried one or two other flag patterns thanks to new unit additions.  In May 1862, Breckinridge’s Corps, then two divisions, created its own distinctive battle flag; blue field with large red Latin cross adorned with thirteen white stars.

 

These patterns would fly over the Army of Tennessee into 1863 but these were not the only flags they carried at least until 1864.

ThCleburne flag 2e Hardee pattern flag has also been called the Cleburne flag, because Cleburne’s division was allowed to continue to carry these distinctive flags after December 1863. When Joseph E. Johnston assumed command of the Army of Tennessee, he replaced most of the army’s existing flags with a rectangular variant of the Army of Northern Virginia pattern flag (first designed by P.G.T. Beauregard.) As a mark of special favor, recognizing their outstanding fight at Ringgold Gap, Cleburne’s men kept their blue flags and, in fact, received new versions.  However, some units still bore other flags including First Nationals, Second Nationals, a few Bragg pattern flags and the twelve star Southern Cross battle flags from the Mobile Depot carried by Polk’s Army of Mississippi which had come to Georgia to reinforce Johnston.

At Chickamauga, D. H. Hill’s Corps mostly carried Hardee pattern flags – Breckinridge’s and Cleburne’s Divisions.

In September 1863 Polk’s Corps, included Cheatham’s and Hindman’s Divisions, still mostly carried Polk Pattern flags.  Based on surviving examples, new flags of this pattern seem to have been issued earlier in 1863.

22nd Alabama Polk Variant flagOne interesting variant of the Polk pattern flag can be found in Zacariah Deas’s Brigade of Hindman’s Division – the 22nd Alabama’s flag lacked the stars on the cross, which was solid white instead of red.  Based on flags of the pattern captured at Missionary Ridge, the rest of the brigade also carried this pattern.  These Alabama troops hailed from Southern Alabama which had been French long before the war.  It is possible that Imperial (pre-Revolution) army battle flags influenced the designed used by Deas’ men.

 

ANV 3rd BuntingHere is the Army of Northern Virginia flag, Third Bunting issue, which most if not all of Longstreet’s five brigades carried.  It is also known as the Richmond Depot flag. Some of Longstreet’s regiments also carried earlier Second Bunting issues of this flag, which are identical to the Third Bunting version save for orange exterior borders.  Many of these flags were unmarked; other bore unit designations or battle honors.  The regimental flags of Kershaw’s South Carolina Brigade had white battle honos, for example.  This pattern was designed in February 1861 by William Porcher Miles of the Committee of Flag and Seal of the Confederate Congress as the national flags of the new Confederacy.  Initially rejected, Miles brought hes design back in September 1861, showing it to Gen. P.G. T. Beauregard who, along with Gen. Joseph Johnston, was seeking to create a “war flag” for the main army in Virginia.

First nationalThe Confederate cavalry flags at Chickamauga were dominated by First National battle flags.  Unlike the cavalry of Robert E. Lee’s army, which standardized their flags from November 1861 onward, western cavalry units preferred First Nationals.  Army of Tennessee cavalry would not carry Southern Cross flags until 1864 when they received the rectangular versions like those issued to the artillery and infantry.  A few artillery batteries also carried First National flags.  Longstreet’s corps used First National flags to mark headquarters as did Army of Tennessee general officers.  The use of Second National flags for this purpose, despite being created in May 1863, would not occur until his corps returned to Virginia in 1864.  Based on evidence, even AOT units seemed not to adopt the flag very much and in 1864, this army created its own special designating flags.

Buckner’s Corps carried a mix of flags.

Most of Stewart’s Division previously belonged to Hardee’s Corps, and carried Hardee pattern flags of some sort. Preston’s Division, however, was a different story.

McCown 2 flagSome of Preston’s troops carried this flag, or a variant of it: The McCown battle flag as used by at least some of the Army of Kentucky in the 1862 invasion of that state.   Gen. John McCown was of Scottish heritage and the flag of Scotland formed the basis for this battle flag.  Surviving flags in the Alabama state collection for Hilliard’s legion, for example, tend to be McCown flags, at least one has a red St. Andrews Cross, instead of white. However, the 2nd Battalion of Hilliard’s Legion used a home made Southern Cross flag that was pierced by over 80 bullets at Chickamauga.

When it comes to flags, the Reserve Corps had by far the most varied set.

Of the five brigades comprising the corps, only two likely had the same type of flags.

16th South Carolina flagColquitt’s Brigade (formerly commanded by Gist, until he was elevated to command the division) and at least some of Wilson’s Brigade carried this flag, very similar to the ANV battle flag, issued to them at Charleston in the spring of 1863. When P. G. T. Beauregard took command of the Department of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida; he ordered flags similar to those he had championed in Virginia.   These were made through the Charleston Depot.

 

mccown_battle_flag_1863Ector’s and McNair’s brigades, however, still carried McCown pattern flags. One additional unusual feature of the McCown pattern flag of the 39th North Carolina Infantry is that colored triangles were added to the corners of the flag, as shown in this example, to further distinguish it.

Liddell’s division was similarly mismatched. Govan’s brigade carried Hardee pattern flags, since they had come from Hardee’s Corps. Walthall’s Mississippians, despite serving in Polk’s Corps in their history, also carried Hardee flags.  They lost several of these in late November on Lookout Mountain.

 

Cassidy 3rd patternThis flag is known as the Bragg/Cassidy pattern flag, thought it owes its existence to Beauregard as well. When Beauregard arrived in the West in January 1862, he began to standardize the myriad of battle flags in use by the various Confederate armies.  With Albert Sidney Johnston’s approval, Beauregard forced two of the corps to adopt flags like those in Virginia; Bragg’s and Polk’s.  However, Polk’s shipment got lost and did not arrive until after Shiloh so his older Polk Corps flags were used there instead.  Assuming command of the Army of the Mississippi after Albert Sidney Johnston’s death at Shiloh, he continued his attempts to standardize flags on the pre-existing ANV pattern.   Events largely outpaced this effort, and Hardee’s Corps simply refused to change their blue and white flags.  Later, Breckinridge’s Corps adopted distinctive colors that also differed from the Virginia flag.   The Bragg/Cassidy flags (named for their maker, Henry Cassidy of New Orleans) came in square and later rectangular versions.  Both were used at Chickamauga.

First pattern cassidyThe flag pictured above is a third issue Cassidy, used intermittently within the army of Tennessee to replace worn-out flags as needed. Here is a first issue Cassidy, by way of comparison. Similar to the ANV Pattern flags, there are still some noteworthy differences even between the Cassidy flags. For one, the third-issue is rectangular, not square. On both flags, the stars are six-pointed, and there are only 12, not 13. These flags were issued from the summer of 1862 up through some time in 1863. The square versions had yellow borders; third-issues had pink; later versions had neither. .

The Battle of Chickamauga, Sept. 18-20, 1863, saw the biggest diversity of Confederate flag patterns of any Western battle. Most of what we know about flag usage here is based on surviving examples. However, we cannot be 100 per cent certain that our understanding of the colors carried into action by Confederate units is comprehensive or complete. Many flags are missing, their details never recorded, in part due to the constant shifting of units within the Army of Tennessee prior to Chickamauga.

That said, we know of at least eight different major patterns of battle flag present:

 

*First National

* Hardee battle flag (three versions)

* Polk Corps (possibly both versions)

* Bragg Corps pattern (both versions)

* Breckinridge pattern

* Army of Kentucky pattern

*Richmond Depot battle flag (2 versions)

* Charleston Depot pattern

Additionally, there were almost certainly  other flags of unique design or ANV variants

People today know that the Confederate flag, the “battle flag,” is red overall.  However, at Chickamauga, as at earlier Western battles like Stones River and Perryville, the majority of the Confederate battle flags were blue!  The Union troops who faced the Western Confederates for over a year were very familiar with these flags on numerous fields.  What must have offered some confusion were the red battle flags that dominated Longstreet’s eastern Confederates, although they had seen some red flags from Bragg’s corps for a time as well.

 

A little help from my friends…

April 13, 2016

Just a quick note. We are preparing to publish a paperback edition of The Chickamauga Campaign, Vol. I – A Mad Irregular Battle.

This means that we can clean up annoying typos.

So, if you know of any, please send them my way. Be specific – page and paragraph, etc.

We will try and correct as many as possible.

 

Trump’s Chickamauga?

April 11, 2016

OK, this is hands down the most unexpected Chickamauga reference I have seen lately.

Check out this post on another site:

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/purple-wisconsin/375243731.html

money excerpt:

“I took my cigar out of my mouth, gazed at the butt philosophically, then looked up and caught him in my steely gaze.  “It was more like Chickamauga,” I growled.

“How so?” a guy from Brookfield wanted to know.  He is a bona fide Civil War buff.

“You Cruz boys had the advantage of home territory, the Trump guys made some tactical missteps, and you launched a devastating attack right through an internally generated hole in the Trump lines,” I noted.  “But the hard core of Trump support rallied, gained a few delegates, and retired in order from the field.  Lessons were learned.  Now Trump reinforcements are gathering for the next battle in New York, where Cruz will probably find the outcome far less encouraging.” 

 

That is so cool.

PS, this is not a chance to let everyone trot out their various political opinions and theories. Just bask in the idea of Chickamauga becoming the new go-to reference.:)

The 2016 Chickamauga-Chattanooga Study Group: A summation.

April 2, 2016

It has been three weeks since the 2016 CCNMP Study Group concluded, and a rousing success it was.

DSC_4164

In Sequatchie Valley, outside of Dunlap

Attendance was strong – we had about 45 attendees each for Friday and Saturday – just about the right size for a group, in my opinion. That number fits comfortably on the bus, and provides a manageable group for the walking portion on Saturday.

Friday we explored the Sequatchie Valley and Walden’s Ridge (note, the modern name is Walden Ridge, the possessive “s” seems to have disappeared) the stage for General Rosecrans’s deceptive play-acting, as carried out by the brigades of Wagner, Hazen, Minty, and Wilder. We began the day on the now much-truncated Cameron Hill in Chattanooga, and ended it across the river on Stringer’s Ridge, nearly opposite our starting point.

Friday night we added something: an evening Q&A session with Jim Ogden, myself, and Lee White. When on the bus or on the battlefield, we are often asked questions, but the answers can be hard for everyone to hear. The evening session provided a venue to do exactly that – it was also a lot of fun, and we will continue that event next year.

DSC_4303

Saturday was spent on foot, focusing first on the difficult fight experienced by Horatio Van Cleve’s Division of the XXI Corps in the woods east of Brotherton field, and then, in the afternoon, the first half of John C. Breckinridge’s attack through McDonald Field and down into Kelly Field. We will revisit Breckinridge in 2017, exploring the second half of that action, in which various Federal units combined to expel Breckinridge’s Rebels from Kelly Field.

2016 marks the second time we bailed on exploring the new battlefield park at Resaca, for the important reason that it wasn’t open, nor could we arrange a tour. The good news is that the park projects a grand opening on May 13, 2016, and so we should be able to – at last – visit that park next March.

We once again raised a considerable sum of money, roughly $1,000. As usual, there are many worthy causes that need our help, but based on group consensus, we are focused on two:

the first is a contribution to the monument fund at Chickamauga, money that goes towards the repair and upkeep of those many monuments, markers, tablets and signboards that give the park its “outdoor classroom” aspect.

The second is the likely upcoming appeal from the Civil War Trust concerning some highly significant land preservation around Dalton. Just prior to the tour, Pat McCormick and I spent some time exploring civil war sites around Dalton, which are very impressive, but much more remains to be done. While Dalton is, strictly speaking, outside the remit of the CCNMP Study Group; the land around Dalton has great significance for the men of both armies who fought at Chickamauga and Chattanooga, and chances to save important land can be fleeting.

As I make those donations on behalf of the group, I will post updates here.

This is now the 12th, 13th (or maybe even the 14th) annual event. Ironically, I don’t have a great head for dates, at least modern ones – go figure.  I had no idea, when I began this effort, that the event would become so successful, so popular, or so long-lived. Thanks to all who attended, and who made the weekend special.

And I would be remiss if I did not extent special thanks to Charlie Banks, who is fast becoming the official trip photographer.

Next year in Chattanooga!

2016 Study Group final update

February 28, 2016

This will probably be the last update on the 2016 Study Group.

We have 42 folks registered. The bus seats 55. I will be on the road from Friday, March 4 onward, and so I will not be able to record and confirm your registration after that date. At this point, if you are planning to attend and have not yet sent in your check for Friday the 11th, you’d better plan on signing up on-site. Remember we meet at the Chickamauga-Chattanooga Visitor’s Center at 8:00 a.m.

On Friday evening, we will be conducting a Q&A panel from 7:30 to 9 PM. That Panel will be held at Fort Oglethorpe’s Constitution Hall, 201 Forrest Rd, Fort Oglethorpe GA, just a few minutes from the park’s north entrance.

Panelists will include Lee White, myself and Jim Ogden (of course, what party would be complete without Jim?)

map to Constitution Hall

I decided to include the panel this time because there are often questions that arise on the bus, and not everyone gets to ask their question, nor do we always have time to answer. The panel is new this year, and a bit experimental: We’ll see how well everyone likes it. I hope to see you all there.

Thanks, once again, for making this a great event.

 

The end is Nigh…

February 27, 2016

Layout 1

Yesterday, Feb 26th, marks an important date: to wit, the beginning of the editing process for The Chickamauga Campaign, Volume Three: Barren Victory. I received the first two chapters of edited text from Ted Savas, and have started working through the notes and comments. I also received this prototype of the book cover earlier in the week.

Barren Victory will be published this fall, September 2016. When it appears, it will represent the completion of a 17 year project (start to finish) representing a good chunk of my writing life. Signing off on that last chapter will be both extremely satisfying and feel a bit like I have lost something important.

The editing process should go fairly rapidly. you’d think that after four previous books with Savas-Beatie, I would have learned to do everything right the first time – hah!. Still, the first comments were not angst-inducing.

The end is indeed nigh…

Glory or the Grave receives the Harwell Award

February 17, 2016

cropped-the-chickamauga-campaign-cover-low-res.jpg

A couple of weeks ago, I was notified that Glory or the GraveVol. II of The Chickamauga Campaign, was going to be awarded the prestigious Richard B. Harwell Book Award, for best book on a Civil War subject published in 2015. Now that the Atlanta CWRT has publically announced the award at their recent February meeting, I can also make mention of it here.

Of course I am delighted. Casting over the list of previous recipients, I am also humbled – there are some heavy hitters on that list.

Even more humbling, I am the first two-time recipient; the Atlanta CWRT awarded the Harwell prize to Failure in the Saddle for 2010.

As an author, it is of course gratifying to receive recognition for one’s work. This is recognition indeed. Even better, perhaps Chickamauga is emerging from the dark ages of Civil War scholarship after a long drought. This complex battle, filled with drama both personal and martial, deserves more recognition.

All I can say is thank you.

For the Atlanta Civil War Round Table’s announcement, go here.

Study Group update

February 13, 2016

Hello, just a quick update. We now have 38 folks signed up. The bus holds 55, so we still have room. I expect, based on previous history, that we will have about 45 – 50 folks, so if you want to make sure you have a seat ( in case of last minute surges) get your reservation in soon.

Here is the link providing full details.

Looks like we made the right call on Resaca – the park is still not open, though things are progressing. It looks like the grand opening will be on May 13, 2016. A few more details here.

On Friday, we will be stopping first at Cameron Hill in Chattanooga, to discuss the Confederate dispositions to defend the town, and also view the forbidding terrain on the north bank. After that, we will head west towards Jasper, and then up the Sequatchie Valley for a ways before we ascend the western side of Walden Ridge.

We will be tracking the route of the 21st Corps, and more specifically, Wilder’s, Minty’s, Hazen’s, and Wagner’s brigades as they conduct their deception operations in front of Chattanooga.

This part of the campaign is not much traveled by tour groups; it is remote and time-consuming – hard to squeeze into a conventional tour. The ongoing success of the CCNMP Study Group has allowed us to explore many such secondary sites, as well as enjoy some of the best scenery in the southeastern United States.

See you in just about a month.

 

 

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 578 other followers